Please click on the word “comment” (in Bold) below to post your information on useful resources.
-
Categories
-
Recent Posts
- Kennecott Permits Appealed
- TAKE ACTION: Help Stop New Kennecott Exploration
- March 11 - DNRE to Host Public Meeting on Modifications to Kennecott Groundwater Permit
- Kennecott Attempts to Sidestep the EPA: Seeks permit amendment
- Author Eric Hansen to do U.P. Slide Shows March 4, 6
- Feds outline lakes cleanup plan
- Skip Jones to perform March 2
- Rio Tinto Uranium Mine Leak
- Ballot Delayed Until 2012
- Woodland Road - Written Comment Accepted Until 20th
- China Files Charges Against 4 Rio Tinto Employees
- DNRE Grants Humboldt Permits
- Event to Help Locked-Out Rio Tinto Borax Workers
- Wall Street Journal Covers U.P. Mining
- Woodland Road Hearing: Permit Analysis
-
Blog Archives
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007

5 Comments
This new bulletin board is a great idea and can be very useful. I have at least one thing to send–the Federal EPA (Region 5) office contacts in regard to “Solution Mining” and the proposed Kennecott Minerals’ mine on the Yellow Dog Plains.
I will send it to info@swp.org.
Hope it may be useful, as it includes telephone numbers, names of the two EPA staffers involved in considering the Kennecott EPA permits, and also their e-mail addresses.
I believe that the EPA also has to hear from those of us who oppose any more permits to be issued to Kennecott. Obviously, Michigan’s Governor, as well as the Michigan DNR and DEQ have recently failed to protect our local environment on this metallic sulfide mining issue.
To Douglas Scott Treado
I would like the info re:the federal EPA {region 5] as well as the names,e-mail addresses of the two EPA staffers involed in considering the Kennecott EPA permits. Ican’t get it from info@swp.org because I do not have that program. I would like to email my thoughts and express my strong opposition to the Kennecott mine. Could you email me the info? It would seem as though the EPA is our last hope??!! Thank you Toni Carey
Response to Toni Carey & EPA/Region 5 Office e-mail addresses to the geologists who are “handling” the Kennecott Minerals’ permit requests:
1) Ross Micham, geologist, Underground Injection Control Branch.
W
Email: micham.ross@epamail.epa.gov
Telephone: (312) 886-4237
2) (On vacation ’til March 10th)-
Stephen Roy
Email: roy.stephen@epamail.epa.gov
Telephone: (312) 886-6556
Another person, if you telephone, is:
Lisa Perenchio - she can help you reach people in the Region 5 Office in Chicago.
(I HAVE ALSO SENT THIS SAME INFORMATION TO THE YELLOW DOG WATERSHED PRESERVE MEMBERSHIP.)
To douglas Scott Treado
I also thank you for the contact info. This is what I have been looking for. We are property owners on the WI side of the Menominee river right across from the Back 40 project. This is a company from Canada(Aquila Resources) that is in the exploration stage of drilling & on thier way to obtaining permits for a mine. WI DNR also has let us down. It is time for the EPA to get involved!
Rio Tinto is slashing their new project development budget from $9 billion dollars to 4 billion dollars according to an ivestment website as shown below. Also, the have slashed 14,000 jobs. All of this is due to a softer metals market, mainly iron ore, but possibly metals as well.
Post a Comment