<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DEQ Reverses Kennecott Preliminary Decision!!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.savethewildup.org/blog/deq-reverses-kennecott-preliminary-decision/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.savethewildup.org/blog/deq-reverses-kennecott-preliminary-decision/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: savethewildup</title>
		<link>http://www.savethewildup.org/blog/deq-reverses-kennecott-preliminary-decision/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>savethewildup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 18:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.savethewildup.org/blog/deq-reverses-kennecott-preliminary-decision/#comment-90</guid>
		<description>This is a wonderful step in a positive direction, but by no means is it an end.  It is still very important to continue our efforts to educate and enlighten our elected and appointed officals on the risks associated with sulfide mining.  Your voice needs to be heard by those who are in a position to make change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a wonderful step in a positive direction, but by no means is it an end.  It is still very important to continue our efforts to educate and enlighten our elected and appointed officals on the risks associated with sulfide mining.  Your voice needs to be heard by those who are in a position to make change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shirley Bergman</title>
		<link>http://www.savethewildup.org/blog/deq-reverses-kennecott-preliminary-decision/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirley Bergman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 06:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.savethewildup.org/blog/deq-reverses-kennecott-preliminary-decision/#comment-88</guid>
		<description>With today's announcement that the DEQ has withdrawn its proposed decision on the Kennecott Mining application, should letter-writing campaigns from constituents to state leaders and state newspapers be continued?  I was in the process of writing my letters when I read this announcement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With today&#039;s announcement that the DEQ has withdrawn its proposed decision on the Kennecott Mining application, should letter-writing campaigns from constituents to state leaders and state newspapers be continued?  I was in the process of writing my letters when I read this announcement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
